AN ANALYSIS OF THE BIOSAFETY ACT AS A DOMESTICATION OF THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY CASE STUDY: KENYA

  • Type: Project
  • Department: Law
  • Project ID: LAW0305
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 112 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 265
  • Report This work

For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Certification ................................................................................................................ i

Declaration ................................................................................................................. i

Dedication .................................................................................................................. ii

Acknowledgements................................................................................................... iii

Table of contents ........................................................................................................ iv

List of international instruments ............................................................................... ix

List of statutes . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . .. x

Case applicable.......................................................................................................... xi

Abbreviations.......................................................................................................... xii

CHAPTER ONE

SCOPE OF THE STUDY

1.1 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................. 1

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM ............................................................... 4

1.3JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY................................................................ 5

1.40BJECTIVES.................................................................................................. 6

1.5HYPOTHESES................................................................................................ 6

1.6RESEARCH QUESTIONS.............................................................................. 7

1.7METHODOLOGY........................................................................................... 7

1.8LITERATURE REVIEW................................................................................. 8

1.9CHAPTERBREAKDOWN............................................................................ 12

iv

CHAPTER TWO

INTERNATIONAL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS DEALING WITH BIOSAFETY

2.1 DEFINITION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY .................................................. 13

2.1.1 The value and loss of biological diversity .............................................. 14

2.2 DEFINITION AND SCOPE OF MODERN BIOTECHNOLOGY .................... 15

2.2.1 Benefits of modern biotechnology ......................................................... 16

2.2.2 Adverse effects of modern biotechnology .............................................. 17

2.2.2.1 Environmental Concerns .......................................................... 18

2.2.2.2 Health (Food) Concerns ........................................................... 18

2.2.2.3 Economic Concerns................................................................. 19

2.2.2.4 Social Concerns....................................................................... 19

2.3 BIOSAFETY ....................................................................................................... 19

2.4 THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY .................................... 20

2.5 THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY....................................... 22

2.6 THE CODEX ALIMENT ARIUS....................................................................... 26

2.7 THE INTERNATIONALPLANT PROTECTION CONVENTION........................ 29

2.8 THE TRADE RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

RIGHfS ...................................................................................................... 30

2.9 THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW

VARIETIES OF PLANTS.................................................................................................. 33

2.10 THE INTERNATIONAL TREATY ON PLANT AND GENETIC

RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ..................................................... 35

2.11 THE OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES........................................... 37

2.12 CONCLUSION........................................................................................................... 38

v

CHAPTER THREE

LAWS RELATING TO BIOSAFETY IN KENYA .............................................. 40

3.1 THE CONCEPT OF DOMESTICATION OF TREATY LAW .......................... 40

3.1.1 The domestication process ..................................................................... .43

3.2 LAWS REGULATING BIOSAFETY ................................................................. 44

3.2.1 The Constitution ofKenya ..................................................................... 45

3.2.2 The Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act ..................... 4 6

3.2.3 The Wildlife (Conservation and Management) Act .............................. 48

3.2.4 The Forests Act. ..................................................................................... 49

3.2.5 The Crop Production and Livestock Act ................................................ 50

3.2.6 The Industrial Property Act.. ................................................................. 51

3.2.7 The Seeds and Plant Varieties Act ......................................................... 52

3.2.8 The Science and Technology Act ......................................................... 53

3.2.8.1 Science and Technology Institution ......................................... 56

3.2.8.1.1 The Kenya Medical Research Institute ..................... 56

3.2.8.1.2 Kenya Agricultural Research Institute ....................... 56

3.2.8.1.3 Department of Veterinary Services ............................ 56

3.2.9 The Agricultural produce (Export) Act .................................................. 57

3.2.10 The Suppression ofNoxious Weeds Act .............................................. 58

3.2.11 The Plant Protection Act ....................................................................... 58

3.2.11.1 Phytosanitary Measures .......................................................... 58

3.2.12 The Standards Act. ................................................................................ 60

3.3 THE BIOSAFETY ACT ....................................................................................... 61

3.4 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................... 62

vi

CHAPTER FOUR

ANALYSING THE BIOSAFETY ACT IN LIGHT OF THE CARTAGENA

PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY ............................................................................. 65

4.1 ANALYSIS OF THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS .................................................... 66

4.1.1 Part I- preliminary provisions ................................................................ 66

4.1.2 Part II-Administrative provisions .......................................................... 70

4 .1.3 Part III- Handling requests for approvals ............................................... 72

4.1.4 Part IV- Reviews and Appeals ................................................................ 79

4.1.5 Part V- Miscellaneous Provisions ........................................................... 80

4.2 VITAL PROVISIONS OF THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL MITTED

FROM THE ACT ...................................................................................................... 82

4.2.1 Art. 11 Procedure for Living Modified Organism intended for

direct use as food, feed or for processing. . ..... .. ...... .. .......... .... ....... ..... 82

4.2.2 Art. 18- Handling, transport, packaging and identification .................. 83

4.3 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 84

CHAPTER FIVE

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BIOSAFETY ACT.......................................... 88

5.1 CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTING THE BIOSAFETY ACT ..................... 88

5.1. Limited access to relevant information................................................... 88

5 .1.2 Liability and redress .............................................................................. 8 9

5.1.3 Large volumes of goods ........................................................................ 89

5.1.4 Capacity Building .................................................................................. 90

5.1.4.1 Limited Experts ....................................................................... 90

5.1.4.2 Dissemination of information .................................................. 90

5.1.4.3 Intellectual Property Rights ..................................................... 91

vii

5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF

TliE BIOSAFETY ACT ........................................................................................... 91

5.2.1 Capacity building ................................................................................... 91

5.2.2 Political Will. ......................................................................................... 92

5.2.3 Regional Biosafety Standard .................................................................. 92

5.2.4 Public knowledge and participation ....................................................... 93

5.2.5 Transparency .......................................................................................... 93

5.2.6 Accountability ....................................................................................... 94

5.2.7Institutional, Intergovernmental and Nongovernmental support

and assistance ................................................................. 94

5.2.8 Creation and use of institutional and legal frameworks ......................... 95

5.3 CONCLUSON ...................................................................................................... 95

BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................... 97


AN ANALYSIS OF THE BIOSAFETY ACT AS A DOMESTICATION OF THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY CASE STUDY: KENYA
For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

Share This
  • Type: Project
  • Department: Law
  • Project ID: LAW0305
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 112 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 265
Payment Instruction
Bank payment for Nigerians, Make a payment of ₦ 5,000 to

Bank GTBANK
gtbank
Account Name Obiaks Business Venture
Account Number 0211074565

Bitcoin: Make a payment of 0.0005 to

Bitcoin(Btc)

btc wallet
Copy to clipboard Copy text

500
Leave a comment...

    Details

    Type Project
    Department Law
    Project ID LAW0305
    Fee ₦5,000 ($14)
    No of Pages 112 Pages
    Format Microsoft Word

    Related Works

    TABLE OF CONTENTS Certification ................................................................................................................ i Declaration ................................................................................................................. i Dedication... Continue Reading
    • Type:Project
    • ID:LAW0305
    • Department:Law
    • Pages:112
    TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ..................................................................................................... i APPROVAL ............................................................................................................ ii DEDICATION... Continue Reading
    • Type:Project
    • ID:LAW0260
    • Department:Law
    • Pages:112
    ABSTRACT Wireless ad hoc networks are inherently vulnerable, as any node can disrupt the communication of potentially any other node in the network. Many solutions to this problem have been proposed. In this paper, we take a fresh and comprehensive approach that addresses simultaneously three aspects: security, scalability and adaptability to... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT Wireless ad hoc networks are inherently vulnerable, as any node can disrupt the communication of potentially any other node in the network. Many solutions to this problem have been proposed. In this paper, we take a fresh and comprehensive approach that addresses simultaneously three aspects: security, scalability and adaptability to... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT IP multicast is facing a slow take-off although it has been a hotly debated topic for more than a decade. Many reasons are responsible for this status. Hence, the Internet is likely to be organized with both unicast and multicast enabled networks. Thus, it is of utmost importance to design protocols that allow the progressive deployment... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT IP multicast is facing a slow take-off although it has been a hotly debated topic for more than a decade. Many reasons are responsible for this status. Hence, the Internet is likely to be organized with both unicast and multicast enabled networks. Thus, it is of utmost importance to design protocols that allow the progressive deployment... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT Electrical power project like most of the construction projects are complex, dynamic, unique and prone to uncertainties, hence pose challenges even to the best of the project managers. The project team faces unprecedented changes in addition to constraints of budgets, time and quality. Review of literature reveals diverging opinions as to... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT This work describes the design and implementation of protocol scrubbers. Protocol scrubbers are transparent, active interposition mechanisms for explicitly removing network scans and attacks at various protocol layers. The transport scrubber supports downstream passive network-based intrusion detection systems by converting ambiguous... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT This work describes the design and implementation of protocol scrubbers. Protocol scrubbers are transparent, active interposition mechanisms for explicitly removing network scans and attacks at various protocol layers. The transport scrubber supports downstream passive network-based intrusion detection systems by converting ambiguous... Continue Reading
    Call Us
    whatsappWhatsApp Us